Executive Summary

Re-bidding facilities management contracts without leveraging historical performance data is leaving money on the table. While initial bids rely on industry benchmarks and assumptions, incumbents possess invaluable asset-specific intelligence that transforms guesswork into precision. This note demonstrates how maintenance performance analysis enables accurate resource forecasting, competitive pricing, and margin protection in re-bid scenarios.

For P&L holders, this approach eliminates the traditional choice between winning contracts at razor-thin margins or losing to competitors making unsustainable assumptions. Instead, evidence-based bidding creates sustainable competitive advantages while protecting profitability.

The Re-Bid Reality: Moving Beyond Assumptions

The Incumbent Advantage Squandered

Most FM companies approach re-bids as if they were first-time bidders, relying on the same generic assumptions as competitors who've never touched the facility. This represents a fundamental strategic error. After managing a facility for years, incumbents possess:

Actual Asset Behavior Data: Real failure patterns, maintenance frequencies, and resource requirements rather than manufacturer recommendations or industry averages.

Site-Specific Intelligence: Environmental factors, operational stresses, and unique conditions that impact maintenance needs differently than standard facilities.

Historical Cost Reality: Documented labor hours, parts consumption, and intervention effectiveness that eliminates pricing uncertainty.

The Cost of Assumptions

A recent analysis of 600 work orders across 2.5 years revealed how assumptions fail reality:

• 32 assets (1.5% of total) generated 30% of all maintenance work
• These "problem assets" required 3-4x the industry-standard maintenance frequency
• Traditional bidding would under-price these assets by 40-60% while over-pricing stable assets

Financial Impact: Blanket assumption bidding creates cross-subsidization where profitable assets support loss-making ones, obscuring true operational costs and preventing strategic pricing decisions.

Evidence-Based Re-Bidding Framework

Asset Performance Segmentation

Transform your work order history into strategic intelligence:

High-Maintenance Assets (1-2% of portfolio generating 25-35% of work):

• Require specialized pricing with risk premiums
• Candidates for performance guarantees or exclusions
• Potential for value-added predictive maintenance services

Standard Performance Assets (80-85% of portfolio):

• Price competitively using actual historical costs
• Opportunity for efficiency improvements and margin enhancement
• Foundation for long-term partnership value propositions

Low-Touch Assets (10-15% of portfolio):

• Minimal maintenance requirements create margin opportunities
• Use conservative pricing to cross-subsidize problem assets
• Potential for reduced monitoring to optimize costs

Precision Resource Planning

Labor Hour Accuracy: Historical work orders reveal actual time requirements versus assumed standard times. Analysis typically shows:

• Emergency work takes 40-60% longer than planned work
• Travel time varies significantly by asset location and complexity
• Skill-specific requirements differ from generic technician assumptions

Parts and Procurement Reality: Historical consumption patterns enable:

• Accurate spare parts provisioning costs
• Emergency procurement frequency and premium calculations
• Supplier relationship optimization based on actual demand

Seasonal and Cyclical Patterns: Multi-year data reveals:

• Peak demand periods requiring temporary resource scaling
• Equipment lifecycle replacement timing
• Environmental impact patterns (HVAC loads, weather-related failures)

Financial Benefits for P&L Management

Margin Protection Strategies

Risk-Adjusted Pricing: Instead of blanket assumptions, price each asset category based on actual performance:

• High-maintenance assets: Cost-plus with performance incentives
• Standard assets: Competitive pricing with efficiency improvements
• Low-touch assets: Margin optimization opportunities

Contingency Planning: Historical data enables precise contingency calculations:

• Emergency work frequency: Actual percentage vs. assumed 10-15%
• Resource spike requirements: Documented peak demand periods
• Supply chain disruption costs: Historical premium pricing events

Value Demonstration: Performance improvement documentation enables:

• Premium pricing justification through proven results
• Long-term contract negotiations with escalation protection
• Partnership proposals sharing cost savings with clients

Budget Accuracy for Long-Term Contracts

Year-over-Year Planning: Multi-year performance data enables:

• Predictive budget modeling based on asset aging patterns
• Maintenance intensity forecasting as equipment reaches end-of-life
• Technology upgrade ROI calculations with documented baselines

Resource Allocation Optimization: Historical analysis reveals:

• Optimal technician skill mix based on actual work requirements
• Geographic efficiency opportunities through route optimization
• Inventory level optimization balancing carrying costs with availability

Client Budget Planning: Evidence-based forecasting enables:

• Accurate client budget planning reducing mid-contract surprises
• Capital replacement timing based on maintenance cost escalation patterns
• Performance improvement guarantees with documented baselines

Implementation for Re-Bid Success

Pre-Bid Analysis Checklist

Asset Categorization (2-3 weeks before bid submission):

• Segment assets by maintenance frequency and cost intensity
• Identify problem assets requiring specialized attention
• Calculate actual vs. assumed resource requirements per category

Cost Reality Assessment (2-4 weeks before bid submission):

• Document actual labor hours by work type and skill level
• Calculate true parts costs including emergency procurement premiums
• Assess seasonal variation and peak resource requirements

Performance Improvement Documentation (Throughout contract):

• Track maintenance effectiveness improvements over contract term
• Document cost avoidance through predictive interventions
• Quantify client operational improvements and cost savings

Competitive Positioning

Differentiation Strategy: Position as performance partner rather than service provider:

• Present actual improvement metrics achieved during current contract
• Propose performance guarantees based on documented capabilities
• Offer predictive maintenance programs with proven ROI

Pricing Strategy: Use evidence to justify premium pricing:

• Demonstrate cost-per-reliable-operating-hour improvements
• Show total cost of ownership reductions achieved
• Present risk mitigation value through proven performance

Partnership Proposals: Leverage performance history for strategic relationships:

• Propose multi-year contracts with shared savings mechanisms
• Offer guaranteed performance levels with penalty/reward structures
• Present continuous improvement programs with documented success rates

Key Performance Indicators for Re-Bid Success

Operational Evidence

• Maintenance Cost Reduction: Documented percentage decrease year-over-year
• Reliability Improvement: Mean time between failures trending
• Response Time Performance: Emergency work completion within SLA requirements
• First-Time Fix Rate: Percentage improvement over contract term

Financial Validation

• Budget Variance: Actual vs. projected costs demonstrating forecasting accuracy
• Margin Consistency: Stable profitability despite operational challenges
• Cost Avoidance: Quantified savings through predictive maintenance
• Client Satisfaction: Retention rates and feedback correlation with performance

Conclusion: Transforming Re-Bid Strategy

Evidence-based re-bidding transforms facilities management from a commodity service to a strategic partnership. By leveraging actual performance data instead of industry assumptions, FM companies can:

Win More Profitable Contracts: Accurate pricing eliminates the choice between winning unprofitable contracts or losing to unrealistic competitors.

Protect Margins: Risk-adjusted pricing ensures sustainable profitability while remaining competitive.

Strengthen Client Relationships: Performance documentation and accurate forecasting build trust and enable long-term partnerships.

Achieve Sustainable Growth: Evidence-based differentiation creates competitive advantages that compound over time.

The data already exists in your work order systems and maintenance records. The question is whether you'll use it strategically or continue bidding blind against competitors who lack your operational intelligence.

For P&L holders, this represents the difference between reactive cost management and proactive profit optimization. In an industry where margins are under constant pressure, evidence-based bidding provides the precision needed to win profitably and grow sustainably.

The next re-bid is an opportunity to demonstrate that experience and data create value. The only question is whether you'll seize that advantage or surrender it to assumptions.

‍